Home - this site is powered by TWiki(R)
TWiki webs: Main | TWiki | Sandbox   Log In or Register

Changes | Index | Search | Go

Chado

Flexible, can handle a variety of things
Complex
Used differently by different groups
GBrowse integration needs work

Bio::DB::SeqFeature::Store

Works well with GBrowse
Contains serialized Perl objects (is this necessary if you're storing subfeatures separately?)
Less flexible than Chado
Specialized for GFF3?
How widely used?

See page BioStore for some links.

BioSQL

Simpler than Chado, more general than Bio::DB::SeqFeature::Store
How well does it work with GBrowse?
GFF loaders?

Roll our own

Yet Another Genomics Schema?!?!
Integrating something like an RDF triplestore with some relational tables should give scalability + flexibility at the expense of complexity
Going with a pure triplestore makes it easy to map to Semantic Mediawiki, but might not scale

-- MitchSkinner - 21 Mar 2007

Edit | Attach | Print version | History: r5 < r4 < r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © 2008-2014 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback
TWiki Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux